Institutionalization of ESG-principles at the international level and in the Russian Federation, their impact on ferrous metallurgy enterprises. Part 1

The idea of ESG (Environmental – Social – Governance) is based on the concept of sustainable development and represents a fundamentally new approach to making business, characterized by the involvement of companies in solving environmental, social and management problems. Despite the fact that at the international level, the formation of an institutional framework in the field of ESG was initiated 74 years ago, in our country this process was launched only in 1996 with the adoption of the Concept for the Transition of the Russian Federation to Sustainable Development. Ratification by Russia of a number of international documents – the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change (1992), the Kyoto Protocol (1997), the Paris Agreement on Climate (2015) and the active promotion climate policy by most countries of the world aimed at preserving ozone in the atmosphere layer, necessitated the institutionalization of ESG principles at the national level. The activation of this process took place in 2020 and by mid-2021, the national framework in the field of ESG was created. Ferrous metallurgy is one of the basic sectors of the national economy. The discrepancy of ferrous metallurgy enterprises with the ESG criteria, as well as the high carbon and energy intensity of the products of this industry, in the future may cause the loss of sales markets and disruption of sustainable development. The stages of institutionalization of ESG principles at the international level and in the Russian Federation are considered. The necessity of reducing the carbon intensity and energy intensity of ferrous metallurgy products is substantiated in connection with the emerging global trend – the transition of most countries of the world to a low-carbon economy due to the gradual abandonment of coal energy and the gradual cessation of «inefficient» subsidizing of fossil fuels.

1. Friede G., Busch T., Bassen A. ESG and financial performance: Aggregated evidence from more than 2000 empirical stu­dies. Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment. 2015;5(4):210–233. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/20430795.2015.1118917

2. Hoepner A.G.F., Oikonomou I., Sautner Z., Starks L.T., Zhou X. ESG shareholder engagement and downside risk. AFA 2018 Paper. European Corporate Governance Institute – Finance. 2021:671/2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2874252

3. Amel-Zadeh A., Serafeim G. Why and how investors use ESG information: Evidence from a global survey. Financial Analysts Journal. 2018;74(3):87–103. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2925310

4. Starks L.T., Venkat P., Zhu Q. Corporate ESG Profiles and Investor Horizons. 2017:53. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3049943

5. Cornell B., Damodaran A. Valuing ESG: Doing Good or Sounding Good? NYU Stern School of Business; 2020:53. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3557432

6. Demers E., Hendrikse J., Joos P., Lev B.I. ESG didn’t immunize stocks during the COVID-19 crisis, but investments in intangible assets did. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting. 2021;48:433–462. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jbfa.12523

7. Serafeim G. ESG: Hyperboles and reality. Harvard Business School Research Paper Series. 2021:22-031. https://ssrn.com/abstract=3966695

8. Krueger Ph., Sautner Z., Tang D. Y., Zhong R. The effects of mandatory ESG disclosure around the world. European Corporate Governance Institute – Finance. 2021:754/2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3832745

9. Berg F., Kölbel J., Rigobon R. Aggregate Confusion: The Divergence of ESG Ratings. 2019:48. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3438533

10. Kotsantonis S., Serafeim G. Four things no one will tell you about ESG data. Journal of Applied Corporate Finance. 2019;31(2):50–58. Available at URL: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3420297

11. Lin B., Xu M. Good subsidies or bad subsidies? Evidence from low-carbon transition in China’s metallurgical indust­ry. Energy Economics. 2019;83:52–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2019.06.015

12. Lin B., Xu M. Exploring the green total factor producti­vity of China’s metallurgical industry under carbon tax: A perspective on factor substitution. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2019;233:1322–1333. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.06.137

13. Du Zh., Lin B. Analysis of carbon emissions reduction of China’s metallurgical industry. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2018;176:1177–1184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.11.178

14. Piskulova N.A., Kostyunina G.M., Abramova A.V. Climate Policy of Russia’s Main Trading Partners and its Impact on Exports of a Number of Russian Regions. Moscow: Vsemir­nyi fond dikoi prirody (WWF); 2013:223. (In Russ.).

15. Soboleva O.V., Steshenko A.S. ESG-factors as a new mecha­nism for activating responsible investment and achieving sustainable development goals. In: Sustainable Development: Challenges and Opportunities. Collection of articles of St. Petersburg State University of Econo­mics. 2020:246–255. (In Russ.).

16. Ivatanova N.P., Stoyanova I.A. ESG-investing – a new approach to the sustainable development of the Arctic regions of Russia. Izvestiya Tul’skogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Nauki o Zemle. 2021;(4):610–619. (In Russ.).

17. Terent’ev N.E. Green economy and ESG in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic: Some development challenges. Uchenye zapiski Mezhdunarodnogo bankovskogo instituta. 2021;3(37):86–102. (In Russ.).

18. Lukonin S.A., Anosov B.A. China: Decarbonising the eco­nomy and adhering to the ESG principles. Federa­lizm. 2021; 26(3(103)):192–205. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.21686/2073-1051-2021-3-192-205

19. Sokolova N.A., Teimurov E.S. Correlation of sustainable development goals and ESG-principles. Vestnik Universiteta imeni O.E. Kutafina (MGYuA). 2021;12(88):171–183. (In Russ.).

20. Ovechkin D.V. Responsible investments: Impact of ESG ra­ting on firms’ profitability and expected return on the stock market. Scientific journal NRU ITMO. Series “Econo­mics and Environmental Management”. 2021;(1):43–53. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17586/2310-1172-2021-14-1-43-53

21. Strel’nikov E.V. Features of investing in ESG tools, Russian and European experience. Voprosy regional’noi ekonomiki. 2021;4(49):239–245. (In Russ.).

22. Bataeva B.S., Kokurina A.D., Karpov N.A. The impact of ESG reporting on the financial performance of Russian public companies. Upravlenets (The Manager). 2021;12(6):20–32. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.29141/2218-5003-2021-12-6-2

23. Glushakova O.V., Chernikova O.P. Influence of ferrous metal­lurgy enterprises on atmospheric air quality as an ecological component of territories sustainable development. Report 1. Izvestiya. Ferrous Metallurgy. 2021;64(4): 292–301. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17073/0368-0797-2021-4-292-301

24. Glushakova O.V., Chernikova O.P. Influence of ferrous metal­lurgy enterprises on atmospheric air quality as an ecological component of territories sustainable development. Report 2. Izvestiya. Ferrous Metallurgy. 2021;64(8):561–571. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17073/0368-0797-2021-8-561-571

25. Dovbii I.P., Kobylyakova V.V., Minkin A.A. Methodological aspects of the implementation of ESG factors in the new investment cycle of regions. Vestnik Chelyabinskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. 2021;(10(456)):77–86. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.47475/1994-2796-2021-11008

26. Chernobrovin V.P. Ferrous metallurgy of Russia in dyna­mics (1970 – 2018). Vestnik Yuzhno-Ural’skogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya: Metallurgiya. 2020;20(1):7–17. (In Russ.).