SITUATION AND DEVELOPMENT TRENDS OF CONTROL SYSTEMS WITH STRUCTURAL DIVERSITY

This article analyzes the current state and prospects of development
of control systems with structural diversity. The construction of such systems is based on the synthesis of the joint control object and control subsystem. In this case, the control object is an object with a purposefully changing structure. The need to develop new approaches, methods and algorithms for control objects with structural diversity has been showed. The generalized scheme of control system with purposefully variable structure was presented and three types of implementation of the scheme have been identified. Two problems that arise in the development of small analog control objects, which can then be used as physical models of control systems, have been formulated. They are, firstly, ensuring similarity of control system of physical model and full-scale (industrial) control system, and, secondly, the development of the governance structure of the physical model proposed by the academician Krasovskii A.A. The control circuit of control systems
similarity has been considered and a variant of control system with the physical model has been offered. The general structure of an identifier in the form of a closed dynamical system has been given.

1. Emel’yanov S.V., Korovin S.K. Novye tipy obratnoi svyazi: Upravlenie pri neopredelennosti [New types of feedbacks: Control at indeterminacy]. Moscow: Nauka. Fizmatlit, 1997. 352 p. (In Russ.).

2. Myshlyaev L.P., Ivushkin A.A., Sazykin G.P. etc. Sistemy avtomatizatsii na osnove naturno-model’nogo podkhoda: Monografiya v 3-kh tomakh. Tom 2: Sistemy avtomatizatsii proizvodstvennogo naznacheniya [Automation systems on the basis of a full-scale model approach: Monograph in 3 volumes. Vol. 2: Commercial automation system]. Myshlyaev L.P. ed. Novosibirsk: Nauka, 2006. 483 p. (In Russ.).

3. Raу W. Harmon. Advanced process control. McGraw-Hill, New York etc. 1981, 326 p. (Russ.ed.: Raу W. Metody upravleniya tekhnologicheskimi protsessami. Moscow: Mir, 1983. 368 p.)

4. Ljung Lennart. System identification: Theory for the user. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, 1987. (Russ.ed.: Ljung L. Identifikatsiya sistem. Teoriya dlya pol’zovatelya. Tsypkin Ya.Z. ed. Moscow: Nauka, 1991. 432 p.)

5. Venikov V.A. Teoriya podobiya i modelirovaniya [Similarity theory and modeling]. Moscow: Vysshaya shkola, 1976. 479 p. (In Russ.).

6. Ivanova V.S., Balankin A.S., Bunin I.Zh. etc. Sinergetika i fraktaly v materialovedenii [Synergetics and fractals in material science]. Moscow: Nauka, 1994. 383 p. (In Russ.).

7. Lyakhovets M.V., Myshlyaev L.P., L’vova E.I., Ivushkin K.A., Chernyavskii S.V. Joint synthesis of the control object and the controllingsubsystem. Izvestiya VUZov. Chernaya metallurgiya = Izvestiya. Ferrous Metallurgy. 2014, no. 12, pp. 33–36. (In Russ.).

8. Krasovskii A.A. Optimum control by means of a physical predictive model. Avtomatika i telemekhanika. 1979, no. 2, pp. 156–162. (In Russ.).

9. Myshlyaev L.P., Evtushenko V.F., Berezin D.G., Makarov G.V., Ivushkin K.A. Concepts and conditions for control system similarity. Izvestiya VUZov. Chernaya metallurgiya = Izvestiya. Ferrous Metallurgy. 2012, no. 12, pp. 56–58. (In Russ.).

10. Emel’yanov S.V., Korovin S.K., Myshlyaev L.P. etc. Metody identifikatsii promyshlennykh ob”ektov v sistemakh upravleniya [Identification methods of industrial objects in the control systems]. Kemerovo: Kuzbassvuzizdat, 2007. 307 p. (In Russ.).