Scroll to:
Effect of heat treatment on deformation inhomogeneity of carbon steel / stainless steel bimetal
https://doi.org/10.17073/0368-0797-2023-5-580-586
Abstract
The work is devoted to the study of the effect of annealing on mechanical properties and inhomogeneity of plastic deformation of a bimetallic plate made of stainless / carbon steel with the dimensions of the working part 50×7×2 mm. To develop laser technology for producing bimetals of various compositions, the contact zone of two dissimilar steels is of greatest interest. Since the performance characteristics of the entire product as a whole depend on the structure and properties of this zone, interaction of the components of the bimetal in the process of its manufacture leads to appearance of heterogeneity of various types near the interface and in the volumes adjacent to it. The research material was obtained by laser cladding of wire AISI 304 stainless steel on a plate of low-carbon steel St3. Bimetallic samples were subjected to vacuum heating at a temperature of 700 °C at various times from 2 to 8 h. The use of data on the distributions of local strains by the speckle photography method made it possible to consider the process of plastic flow in the initial section of tension diagram and to establish the effect of annealing temperature on plastic strain localization during mechanical tests. For a quantitative assessment of deformation inhomogeneity in the main and cladding layers, we used spatiotemporal distributions of local elongations and the corresponding values of the variation coefficient. It was established that the level of deformation inhomogeneity of microvolumes at the interface during tension is higher than that of the bimetal main layers. With increase in the annealing time, increase in the variation coefficient in the joint zone is noted, which is more significant on the stainless steel side, and this increases the probability of microcracks initiation. The increased level of deformation inhomogeneity of microvolumes of the cladding layer carburized zone is contingent on the increased localization of deformation in nearby microvolumes due to structural heterogeneity.
For citations:
Buyakova S.P., Kayurov K.N., Barannikova S.A. Effect of heat treatment on deformation inhomogeneity of carbon steel / stainless steel bimetal. Izvestiya. Ferrous Metallurgy. 2023;66(5):580-586. https://doi.org/10.17073/0368-0797-2023-5-580-586
Introduction
To effectively handle materials within power-generating or oil refining equipment subjected to simultaneous mechanical loading and high temperatures, it is imperative to develop novel methods for evaluating their performance [1]. These methods should comprehensively consider the influence stemming from various structural and mechanical inhomogeneities [2 – 4]. Despite their high strength, bimetallic materials are particularly susceptible to delamination at their interfaces. Defects like delamination may arise during the manufacturing and operational phases of bimetallic materials, thereby somewhat restricting their industrial applications [5 – 8]. The unevenness of deformation in bimetallic composites during rolling is contingent upon several factors, including the disparity in deformation resistances between components, initial layer thicknesses, stacking sequence, parameters within the deformation zone, and the magnitude of contact friction forces and tangential stresses at the interface [9 – 12]. This deformation irregularity within bimetallic composites detrimentally affects the rolling process and the resultant bimetal properties. It leads to the accumulation of significant residual stresses, which, in turn, can induce bimetal delamination, bending, warping, and the fracturing of harder layers [13 – 16].
An exceptionally promising domain for advancing laser cladding technology using high-performance lasers lies in leveraging cladding materials presented in solid and powder metal strips [17; 18]. The primary motivation driving the shift from conventional coating methods (thermal spraying and arc surfacing) toward laser-based techniques is the superior quality of the coatings produced. This superiority stems from the reduced mixing coefficient between the clad material and the substrate, along with heightened adhesion characteristics [19].
Given that the processes occurring in the vicinity of the interface during laser cladding can significantly influence material properties [20], the objective of this study was to examine the influence of temperature-time factors on the inhomogenity of plastic deformation in bimetallic plates.
Materials and methods
The investigation focused on studying the deformation inhomogeneity of a bimetal comprising low-carbon steel St3 and AISI 304 stainless steel, achieved through laser cladding. The St3 low-carbon steel plate measured approximately 6 mm in thickness, while the AISI 304 stainless steel formed a clad layer of about 1 mm thickness. The laser cladding process, using filler wire, was conducted on plates composed of low-carbon steel St3 at the experimental facility of the Institute of Strength Physics and Materials Science of the Siberian Branch of the RAS. The application of the laser cladding technique involved introducing filler wire into the laser impact zone using a standard arc torch and a semi-automatic welding machine PDGO-601. In this particular laser cladding setup, AISI 304 stainless steel filler wire with a diameter of 1.0 mm served as the material for the clad layer. Employing the fiber laser LS-15, boasting a capacity of 15 kW, facilitated a productivity range of 130 – 170 g/min, resulting in deposited beads measuring 0.8 – 1.5 mm in width. To ensure the creation of a uniform monolithic coating, cladding parameters were meticulously selected based on established technological modes. These included specific settings for scanning width (approximately 30 mm), laser output power (4 kW), and speed (65 mm/min). The scanning process was executed using the “triangular” mode at a frequency of 25 Hz. Upon metallographic examination of cross-sections and XRD (X-ray diffraction) analysis, it was observed that none of the samples exhibited pores, cracks, or unmelted powder particles.
When subjected to heating, bimetals composed of distinct chemical compositions display variations in the rate and direction of diffusion for carbon and alloying elements, contingent upon the temperature of heating [3]. Following heat treatment (conducted via vacuum heating up to 700 °C and holding for durations of 2, 4, 6 and 8 h), the distribution of chemical elements within the steel layers of the bimetallic plate was analyzed. This examination was performed using the LEO EVO 50 scanning electron microscope (Carl Zeiss, Germany), equipped with an Oxford Instruments attachment for X-ray dispersive micro-analysis. These analyses were conducted at the NANOTECH Center for Collective Use, part of the ISPMS SB RAS. Microhardness measurements were carried out using the PMT-3 microhardness tester, following the methodology outlined in GOST 9450 – 76.
During mechanical uniaxial tensile tests performed on flat samples measuring 50×7×2 mm, the deformation fields were recorded using the Walter+Bai LFM-125 testing machine. The deformation rate was set at 6.67·10\(^–\)5 s\(^–\)1 and tests were conducted at room temperature. These tests simultaneously employed an adapted speckle photography technique, as detailed in [21 – 23], to capture the deformation fields. In analyzing the plastic distortion tensor, the local elongation along the direction of the sample’s tensile axis εxx is often considered the most natural component for visualization and analysis. Shear and rotational components exhibit more intricate distributions, rendering them less convenient for analysis. The distributions obtained through these techniques reflect local deformation increments rather than integral values from the commencement of the loading process. Fig. 1, a illustrates a typical distribution of local deformations εxx(x, y) within the sample subsequent to laser cladding, where the total tensile deformation measures 0.01. This data presentation elucidates that post-yield point, plastic deformation becomes localized within specific zones of the sample, while other material volumes exhibit minimal deformation at the given increment. To quantitatively assess the degree of deformation inhomogenity across various layers of the bimetal (substrate and cladding), the coefficient of variation of local deformations εxx was employed. This coefficient is calculated as the ratio of the standard deviation to the arithmetic mean n of measurements:
\[\nu = \frac{{\sqrt {\frac{1}{n}\sum\limits_{i = 1}^n {{{\left( {\left\langle {{\varepsilon _{xx}}} \right\rangle - {\varepsilon _{x{x_i}}}} \right)}^2}} } }}{{\left\langle {{\varepsilon _{xx}}} \right\rangle }},\]
where \(\left\langle {{\varepsilon _{xx}}} \right\rangle = \frac{{\sum\limits_1^n {{\varepsilon _{x{x_i}}}} }}{n}\).
When ν > 0.4 it is considered that the distribution of local elongations εxx within the sample demonstrates a substantial level of inhomogeneity \(\left\langle {{\varepsilon _{xx}}} \right\rangle \) rendering the value not representative [24].
Fig. 1. Distribution of local deformations εxx in the substrate (1) and surfacing (2) |
Results and discussion
The hardness observed within the junction zone of the bimetal was notably higher compared to the hardness measured in both the substrate and the surfacing areas outside this zone (Fig. 1, b). Following heat treatment, as the heating duration increased, the average hardness levels observed in the substrate and surfacing decreased significantly. However, the hardening gradient between the two types of steels near the junction zone remained consistent.
Fig. 2 illustrates the influence of heating duration on the distribution of fundamental elements (iron, chromium, nickel, manganese) across the thickness of the sample. The depicted data indicates that the impact of heating remains insignificant for each of the steel types when compared to their initial states without heat treatment.
Fig. 2. Effect of annealing time on distribution of iron (a), |
The bimetal consists of low-carbon and stainless steel, with a distinct transition layer (I) between them. Within this transitional zone, the concentrations of iron, chromium, nickel, and manganese exhibit a linear variation. The diffusion depth of chromium and nickel into the base layer of low-carbon steel extends up to 20 µm. During the heating process, alloying elements diffuse from the austenitic (stainless) steel into the carbon (pearlitic) steel, while carbon diffuses in the opposite direction.
In Fig. 3, a, the impact of heating duration on the distribution of carbon throughout the sample thickness is depicted.
Fig. 3. Carbon distribution over the thickness of the surfaced sample (a), |
Within the span from carbon steel to stainless steel, the distribution of carbon content manifests in distinct layers: following the transition layer (I), there exist decarburized (II) and supercarburized (III) layers. The thickness of these layers varies in response to the duration of heating. With prolonged annealing periods, the expanding decarburized ferrite zone on the carbon steel side exhibits reduced strength characteristics. Consequently, this contributes to a decrease in the tensile strength of the bimetal (Fig. 3, b). The process of chromium diffusion from the austenitic phase and carbon diffusion in the opposite direction results in the formation of a thin carbide layer on the carbon steel side.
The structural and chemical inhomogeneities near the substrate and cladded layer interface play an important role in shaping the nature of plastic deformation around the transition zone. Ensuring compatibility of deformations at the bimetal interface necessitates an equivalent deformation of metal microvolumes adjoining the interface. Consequently, the levels of deformation inhomogeneity within these microvolumes at the interface layers, as assessed by the coefficient of variation of local deformations ν, are expected to be uniform. By meeting these conditions, the stress conditions within these regions become more intricate.
Fig. 4 illustrates the impact of heat treatment on the changes in the coefficient of variation (ν), which serves as an indicator of the degree of deformation inhomogeneity near the transition zone of the bimetal during the initial stages of deformation. In the bimetal state subsequent to laser cladding, notable differences in the levels of deformation inhomogenity are observed among the microvolumes in the boundary zones of the stainless and carbon steel sides, nearly twofold (Fig. 4, curve 1). The reduced level of deformation heterogeneity is characteristic of the microvolumes in the decarburized zone, directly adjacent to the interface, as well as in the state post-cladding (Fig. 4, curve 1). The existence of a carbide interlayer leads to the emergence of microcracks and a more non-uniform distribution of local deformations within the carburized layer of austenitic steel, with a total deformation of ε = 0.01. Research outlined in [23] demonstrates that at the bimetal’s yield point, the Lüders band originating in the main St3 steel layer can act as a “wedge” in accordance with the Barenblatt wedging model [25], potentially initiating cracks in the cladding layer. Due to heightened local stresses at the interface, the Lüders band contributes to the formation of martensitic α′-phase and the emergence of isolated zones of localized deformation in the clad layer during the initial phase of plastic flow.
Fig. 4. Change in the level of inhomogeneity of deformation ν |
After heat treatment, with increasing annealing duration (Fig. 4, curves 2 – 5), the coefficients of variation of deformation inhomogeneity in the substrate and the cladded metal notably escalate. Even after prolonged annealing, the two steels near the junction zone still exhibit distinct levels of deformation inhomogeneity. Statistical analysis utilizing the double t-criterion method [24] indicates a “significant” difference in the coefficients of variation of deformation heterogeneity between the substrate and the deposited metal.
This study underscores the influence of structural inhomogeneity near the layer interface on the distribution of local deformations when subjecting the bimetal obtained by laser cladding to uniaxial tension. The nature of deformation inhomogeneity in the transition zone and the primary layers varies, potentially impacting the properties of bimetal products. To maintain or prevent a decrease in the mechanical properties of bimetals composed of carbon steel and stainless steel, manufacturing should adhere to technological modes that ensure minimal levels of deformation inhomogeneity within microvolumes at the transition zone.
Conclusions
The bimetal obtained through laser cladding exhibits a considerable increase in hardness within the junction zone. Subsequent heating up to 700 °C, with holding durations ranging from 2 to 8 h, does not diminish the hardening gradient. This lack of reduction is attributed to the formation of a carbide interlayer due to the diffusion of components.
The heat treatment process results in the growth of a decarburized layer on the carbon steel side and a subsequent reduction in the tensile strength of the bimetal.
Elevated values of the coefficient of variation of local deformations within the carburized layer of the cladded metal are linked to heightened concentration of deformations, stemming from the presence of chromium carbides and microcracks. Prolonged annealing durations further escalate the coefficients of variation of deformation inhomogeneity within both the substrate and the cladded metal.
References
1. Khodadad Motarjemi A., Koçak M., Ventzke V. Mechanical and fracture characterization of a bi-material steel plate. International Journal of Pressure Vessels and Piping. 2002;79(3):181–191. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0308-0161(02)00012-1
2. Gao X., Jiang Z., Wei D., Jiao S., Chen D., Xu J., Zhang X., Gong D. Effects of temperature and strain rate on microstructure and mechanical properties of high chromium cast iron/low carbon steel bimetal prepared by hot diffusion-compression bonding. Materials and Design. 2014;63:650–657. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2014.06.067
3. Zasukha P.F., Korshchikov V.D., Bukhvalov O.B., Ershov A.A. Bimetallic Rolling. Moscow: Metallurgiya1971: 264. (In Russ.).
4. Akramifard H.R., Mirzadeh H., Parsa M.H. Estimating interface bonding strength in clad sheets based on tensile test results. Materials and Design. 2014;64:307–309. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2014.07.066
5. Li L., Nagai K., Yin F. Progress in cold roll bonding of metals. Science and Technology of Advanced Materials. 2008;9(2):023001. http://doi.org/10.1088/1468-6996/9/2/023001
6. Li Z., Zhao J., Jia F., Zhang Q., Liang X., Jiao S., Jiang Z. Analysis of bending characteristics of bimetal steel composite. International Journal of Mechanical Sciences. 2018;148:272–283. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2018.08.032
7. DebRoy T., Wei H.L., Zuback J.S., Mukherjee T., Elmer J.W., Milewski J.O., Beese A.M., Wilson-Heid A., De A., Zhang W. Additive manufacturing of metallic components – Process, structure and properties. Progress in Materials Science. 2018;92:112–224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmatsci.2017.10.001
8. Hinojos A., Mireles J., Reichardt A., Frigola P., Hosemann P., Murr L.E., Wicker R.B. Joining of Inconel 718 and 316 Stainless Steel using electron beam melting additive manufacturing technology. Materials and Design. 2016;94:17–27. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2016.01.041
9. Dhib Z., Guermazi N., Ktari A., Gasperini M., Haddar N. Mechanical bonding properties and interfacial morphologies of austenitic stainless steel clad plates. Materials Science and Engineering: A. 2017;696:374–386. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2017.04.080
10. Li Z., Lin Y.C., Zhang L., Jia F., Jiang Z., Jiao S. Investigation of compact tensile and fracture mechanical properties of a duplex stainless steel bimetal composite with the interfacial zone. Journal of Materials Research and Technology. 2022;19:809–820. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmrt.2022.05.085
11. Li Z., Zhao J., Jia F., Liang X., Zhang Q., Yuan X., Jiao S., Jiang Z. Interfacial characteristics and mechanical properties of duplex stainless steel bimetal composite by heat treatment. Materials Science and Engineering: A. 2020;787:139513. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2020.139513
12. Li L., Niu X., Han B., Song L., Li X. Microstructure and properties of laser cladding coating at the end of L415/316L bimetal composite pipe. International Journal of Pressure Vessels and Piping. 2022;195:104568. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpvp.2021.104568
13. Chen N., Ali Khan H., Wan Z., Lippert J., Sun H., Shang S.-L., Liu Z.-K., Li J. Microstructural characteristics and crack formation in additively manufactured bimetal material of 316L stainless steel and Inconel 625. Additive Manufacturing. 2020;32:101037. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2020.101037
14. Li Z., Zhao J., Jia F., Lu Y., Liang X., Yuan X., Jiao S., Zhou C., Jiang Z. Hot deformation behaviour and interfacial characteristics of bimetal composite at elevated temperatures. Intermetallics. 2020;125:106893. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.intermet.2020.106893
15. Li Z., Zhao J., Jia F., Lu Y., Zhang Q., Jiao S., Jiang Z. Analysis of flow behaviour and strain partitioning mechanism of bimetal composite under hot tensile conditions. International Journal of Mechanical Sciences. 2020;169:105317. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2019.105317
16. Fudzii T., Dzako M. Mechanics of Composite Materials Destruction. Moscow: Mir, 1982:232. (In Russ.).
17. Biryukov V., Tatarkin D., Khriptovich E., Fishkov A. Development of technologies and equipment for laser strengthening and melting of mills and machine parts. Stankoinstrument. 2017;9:42–47. (In Russ.). http://dx.doi.org/10.22184/24999407.2017.9.4.42.47
18. Bandyopadhyay A., Heer B. Additive manufacturing of multi-material structures. Materials Science and Engineering: R: Reports. 2018;129:1–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mser.2018.04.001
19. Xi W., Song B., Zhao Y., Yu T., Wang J. Geometry and dilution rate analysis and prediction of laser cladding. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology. 2019;103:4695–4702. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-019-03932-7
20. Kwiecień M., Kopyściański M., Błoniarz R., Muszka K., Majta J. Influence of deformation conditions on the inhomogeneity of plastic flow of structurally graded bimetal systems. Procedia Manufacturing. 2018;15:1649–1655. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2018.07.272
21. Barannikova S.A., Kosinov D.A., Zuev L.B., Gromov V.E., Konovalov S.V. Hydrogen effect on macrolocalization of plastic deformation of low carbon steel. Izvestiya. Ferrous Metallurgy. 2016;59(12):891–895. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17073/0368-0797-2016-12-891-895
22. Danilov V.I., Barannikova S.A., Zuev L.B. Autowaves of localized deformation at initial stages of plastic flow of single crystals. Zhurnal tekhnicheskoi fiziki. 2003;73(11):69–75. (In Russ.).
23. Barannikova S.A., Li Yu.V. Development kinetics of the plastic wave front at the metal interface. Russian Physics Journal. 2020;63(5):731–737. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11182-020-02091-7
24. Mendenhall W.M., Sincich T.L. Statistics for Engineering and the Sciences. New York: Chapman and Hall/CRC; 2016:1182. https://doi.org/10.1201/b19628
25. Barenblatt G.I. The mathematical theory of equilibrium cracks in brittle fracture. Advances in Applied Mechanics. 1962;7:55–129. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2156(08)70121-2
About the Authors
S. P. BuyakovaRussian Federation
Svetlana P. Buyakova, Dr. Sci. (Eng.), Chief Researcher, Head of the Laboratory of Physical Mesomechanics and Non-Destructive Testing
2/4 Akademicheskii Ave., Tomsk 634055, Russian Federation
K. N. Kayurov
Russian Federation
Konstantin N. Kayurov, General Director
34 2nd Yurginskaya Str., Novosibirsk 630051, Russian Federation
S. A. Barannikova
Russian Federation
Svetlana A. Barannikova, Dr. Sci. (Phys.–Math.), Leading Researcher of the Laboratory of Strength Physics
2/4 Akademicheskii Ave., Tomsk 634055, Russian Federation
Review
For citations:
Buyakova S.P., Kayurov K.N., Barannikova S.A. Effect of heat treatment on deformation inhomogeneity of carbon steel / stainless steel bimetal. Izvestiya. Ferrous Metallurgy. 2023;66(5):580-586. https://doi.org/10.17073/0368-0797-2023-5-580-586