Preview

Izvestiya. Ferrous Metallurgy

Advanced search

Energy efficiency of a cone crusher with stops

https://doi.org/10.17073/0368-0797-2022-10-733-739

Abstract

Metallurgical, construction and mining industries are based on the process of grinding various materials. The main method of primary preparation of raw materials is crushing of the extracted ore. Up to 4 % of the world’s electricity production is spent annually on crushing rocks to obtain the necessary fraction of material, and for a single mine, the share of energy consumption for crushing can reach 50 % of the annual volume. In addition to spending electricity directly on rocks destruction, some of it is spent on creating a power reserve for a crushing machine (hereinafter referred to as a crusher) due to the fact that currently there is no single method of theoretical calculation of the power of its electric drive, no single method of determining energy costs for rocks destruction. It is known that raw materials extracted from different deposits have different physical and mechanical properties, which has a significant impact on the grinding process. However, difference in power of electric drive of crushing machines is due to the difference in their standard sizes, and the geography of their application is taken into account by the creation of the above-mentioned power reserve. The above factors have a negative impact on the operating costs of metallurgical industry enterprises. The article discusses some designs of crushers in which the destruction of the crushed piece occurs as a result of complex stress state. New design of a cone crusher with stops is proposed, which allows reducing energy costs for crushing materials. Due to the presence of stops and simple kinematics of the working body movement, reduction in the power necessary for the destruction of pieces of brittle materials, regardless of their properties, is achieved. At the same time, in crushed pieces destroyed in a cone crusher with stops, it is possible to create a shear stress state, in which theoretically a reduction in power required for crushing brittle materials is achieved by 2 times in comparison with compression crushers. The conditions of occurrence of shear stress state in crushed pieces during their crushing in a cone crusher with stops are described. The authors give recommendations for the reconstruction of these conditions.

About the Authors

D. F. Sakharov
Kuzbass Institute of the Federal Penitentiary Service of Russia
Russian Federation

Dmitrii F. Sakharov, Cand. Sci. (Eng.), Senior Researcher of the Organizational, Scientific and Publishing Department

49 Oktyabr’skii Ave., Novokuznetsk, Kemerovo Region – Kuzbass 654066, Russian Federation



A. V. Vitushkin
Kuzbass Institute of the Federal Penitentiary Service of Russia
Russian Federation

Aleksandr V. Vitushkin, Cand. Sci. (Eng.), Senior Lecturer of the Chair of Military and Physical Training

49 Oktyabr’skii Ave., Novokuznetsk, Kemerovo Region – Kuzbass 654066, Russian Federation



References

1. Jeswiet J., Szekeres A. Energy consumption in mining comminution. Procedia CIRP. 2016, vol. 48, pp. 140–145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2016.03.250

2. Lagunova Yu.A. Energy model of rocks crushing by compression. Izvestiya UGGU. 1997, no. 6, pp. 100–104. (In Russ.).

3. Polyakov S.V., Izmailov Yu.V., Konovodchenko V.I., Orudzhev F.M., Polyakov N.D. Masonry from Saw Limestones. Chisinau, 1973, 345 p. (In Russ.).

4. Atta K.T., Euzébio T., Ibarra H., Silva Moreira V., Johansson A. Extension, validation, and simulation of a cone crusher model. IFAC-PapersOnLine. 2019, vol. 52, no. 14, pp. 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifacol.2019.09.154

5. Terva J., Kuokkala V.-T., Valtonen K., Siitonen P. Effects of compression and sliding on the wear and energy consumption in mineral crushing. Wear. 2018, vol. 398-399, pp. 116–126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wear.2017.12.004

6. Lee E., Evertsson C.M. A comparative study between cone crushers and theoretically optimal crushing sequences. Minerals Engineering. 2011, vol. 24, no. 3-4, pp. 188–194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mineng.2010.07.013

7. Gupta A., Yan D.S. Mineral Processing Design and Operation. An Introduction. Elsevier Science, 2006, 693 р.

8. Gröndahl A., Asbjörnsson G., Hulthén E., Evertsson M. Diagnostics of cone crusher feed segregation using power draw measurements. Minerals Engineering. 2018, vol. 127, pp. 15–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mineng.2018.07.008

9. Korman T., Bedekovic G., Kujundzic T., Kuhinek D. Impact of physical and mechanical properties of rocks on energy consumption of jaw crusher. Physicochemical Problems of Mineral Processing. 2015, vol. 51, no. 2, pp. 461–475. http://dx.doi.org/10.5277/ppmp150208

10. Fedotov K.V., Senchenko A.E., Kulikov Yu.V. Method of calculating specific energy of self-/semi-self-grinding based on a combination of Bond working indices. GIAB. 2014, no. 11, pp. 127–140. (In Russ.).

11. Nikitin A.G., Sakharov D.F., Prilukova N.Z. Method of crushing in a roller crusher. Patent RF no. 2430783. Byulleten’ izobretenii. 2011, no. 28. (In Russ.).

12. Nikitin A.G., Epifantsev Yu.A., Medvedeva K.S., Gerike P.B. Power analysis of the process of brittle materials destruction in universal crushing machine with roll locker. Izvestiya. Ferrous Me­tallurgy. 2019, vol. 62, no. 4, pp. 303–307. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17073/0368-0797-2019-4-303-307

13. Nikitin A.G., Lyulenkov V.I., Sakharov D.F., Vitushkin A.V. Jaw crusher. Patent RF no. 2453370. Byulleten’ izobretenii. 2012, no. 17. (In Russ.).

14. Evertsson C.M. Output prediction of cone crushers. Minerals Engineering. 1998, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 215–231. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0892-6875(98)00001-6

15. Gauldie K. Performance of jaw crushers. Engineering. 1953, October, pp. 485–486.

16. Whiten W.J. Simulation and model building for mineral processing. (PhD Thesis). University of Queensland (JKMRC), 1972. https://doi.org/10.14264/uql.2015.62

17. Li H., McDowell G., Lowndes I. Discrete element modelling of a rock cone crusher. Powder Technology. 2014, vol. 263,

18. pp. 151–158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.powtec.2014.05.004

19. Klushantsev B.V., etc. Crushers. Design, Calculation, Features of Operation. Moscow: Mashinostroenie, 1990, 320 p. (In Russ.).

20. Sakharov D.F., Vitushkin A.V. Power analysis of the crushing process in a cone crusher. Izvestiya. Ferrous Metallurgy. 2018, vol. 61, no. 12, pp. 980–986. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17073/0368-0797-2018-12-980-986

21. Lyulenkov V.I., Nikitin A.G., Mochalov S.P., Matekhina A.N. Rotary Crushing Device. Patent RF no. 2526738. Byulleten’ izobretenii. 2014, no. 24. (In Russ.).

22. Rodin R.A. On the work spent on rocks crushing. Izvestiya vuzov. Gornyi zhurnal. 1987, no. 6, pp. 84–89. (In Russ.).

23. Stepin P.A. Resistance of Materials. Moscow: Integral-Press, 1997, 320 p. (In Russ.).


Review

For citations:


Sakharov D.F., Vitushkin A.V. Energy efficiency of a cone crusher with stops. Izvestiya. Ferrous Metallurgy. 2022;65(10):733-739. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17073/0368-0797-2022-10-733-739

Views: 317


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 0368-0797 (Print)
ISSN 2410-2091 (Online)