Optimization of production technologyof continuous cast rail steel for increasing its purity by non-metallic inclusions

The purpose of the work was to examine the reasons for formation of non-deformable non-metallic inclusions in rail steel and ways to reduce the rejection of finished rails due to the defects revealed during ultrasonic testing. The study was conducted at the steelmaking plant of JSC “Ural Steel”. In the central laboratory of the combine, a chemical analysis of non-metallic inclusions was carried out in the samples of finished rails produced from blanks manufactured by JSC “Ural Steel” and rejected at the ultrasonic test unit during the rail production at the “Aktobe Rail and Section Works” LLP. Non-metallic inclusions by their composition are represented by aluminium oxides. The most probable reasons for their formation have been determined as following: the use of aluminium containing ferroalloys and interaction of the melt components with refractory materials and casting powder. The authors made analysis of the ferroalloys used in production of rail steel. Industrial trials of the manufacturing process of continuously cast blanks from rail steel were carried out, where FS65 ferrosilicon, which contains aluminium, was replaced with silicon carbide. An increasing degree of silicon and carbon recovery in trial heats was noted. Evaluation of contamination with non-metallic inclusions and mechanical properties of the rail steel manufactured using the experimental technology showed that the service characteristics of the rail steel meet requirements of the state standard GOST R 51685 – 2013. The full-scale experiment has confirmed that the technology of alloying E76F rail steel with silicon carbide at JSC “Ural Steel” is technically feasible. The yield of 100-meter rails was increased by 17 % on a trial batch produced from JSC “Ural Steel” continuously cast blanks.

1. Freight rail transport in Russia in 2010 – 2015: Analytical report. Institute for Natural Monopoly Problems, May 2016, pp. 2–4. (In Russ.).

2. Anisimov N.K., Zubov S.P., Kuznetsov M.S. , Shepelev D.S., Grigorovich K.V., Grigor’ev А.М. Optimization of the production technology of continuously cast blanks from transport metal for the production of railway rails in order to increase technical and economic efficiency of the new materials use. In: Proceedings of the XV Int. Congr. of Steelmakers. Tula, 2018, pp. 419–422. (In Russ.).

3. Zubchenko A.S., Koloskov M.M., Kashirskii Yu.V., etc. Grade Guide of Steels and Alloys. Zubchenko A.S. ed. Moscow: Mashinostroenie, 2003, 784 p. (In Russ.).

4. Grigorovich K.V., Trushnikova А.S., Arsenkin А.М., Shibaev S.S., Garber А.К. Structure and metallurgical quality of rail steels pro-duced by various manufacturers. Russian Metallurgy (Metally). 2006, vol. 2006, no. 5, pp. 427–438.

5. Shur E.A., Trusova Т.N., Grigorovich K.V., Trushevskii S.М. Application of fractional gas analysis to assess rails performance. In: Materials of the Jubilee Rail Commission. Novokuznetsk 2002, pp. 229–248. (In Russ.).

6. Grigorovich K.V., Arsenkin А.М., Trushnikova А.S., etc. Application of fractional gas analysis to assess the performance properties of rail steel. In: Improving the Quality and Service Life of Rail Steel. Proceedings. Yekaterinburg: UIM, 2005, pp. 102‒115. (In Russ.).

7. Korneva L.V., Yunin G.N., Kozyrev N.A., Atkonova O.P., Polevoi E.V., Comparative analysis of rail product quality indexes of JSC “Novokuznetsk Metallurgical Plant” and foreign manufacturers. Izvestiya. Ferrous Metallurgy. 2010, no. 12, pp. 38–42. (In Russ.).

8. Shur E.A. Rail Damage. Moscow: Intekst, 2012, 192 p. (In Russ.).

9. Sheinman E. Rail wear. Trenie i iznos. 2012, vol. 33, no. 4, pp. 413–422. (In Russ.).

10. Hu Y., Zhou L., Ding H.H., Lewis R., Liu Q.Y., Guo J., Wang W.J. Microstructure evolution of railway pearlitic wheel steels under rolling-sliding contact loading. Tribology International. 2021, vol. 154, article 106685. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.triboint.2020.106685

11. Liu P., Quan Y., Wan J. Yu L. Experimental investigation on the wear and damage behaviors of machined wheel-rail materials under dry sliding conditions. Materials. 2021, vol. 14, no. 3, article 540. http://doi.org//10.3390/ma14030540

12. Zhang L., Thomas B.G. State of the art in evaluation and control of steel cleanliness. ISIJ International. 2003, vol. 43, no. 3, pp. 271–291. http://doi.org//10.2355/isijinternational.43.271

13. Zhao K.-w., Zeng J.-h., Wang X.-h. Nonmetallic inclusion control of 350 km/h high speed rail steel. Journal of Iron and Steel Research International. 2009, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 20–26. http://doi.org/10.1016/S1006-706X(09)60038-8

14. Fruehan R.J., Nassaralla C.L. Evaluation of new steelmaking technologies. In: McLean Symposium Proceedings, Iron & Steel Society, Warrendale, 1998, pp. 205–216.

15. Zhang L., Thomas B.G. State of the art in the control of inclusions during steel ingot casting. Metallurgical and Materials Transactions B. 2006, vol. 37, no. 5, pp. 733–761. http://doi.org/10.1007/s11663-006-0057-0

16. Wijk O., Brabie V. The purity of ferrosilicon and its influence on inclusion cleanliness of steel. ISIJ International. 1996, no. 36, pp. 132–135. https://doi.org/10.2355/isijinternational.36.suppl_s132

17. Steelmaking Data Sourcebook. N.Y.-Tokyo: Gordon&Breach Science Publ, 1988, 325 p.

18. Snitko Yu.P., Surovoi Yu.Т., Lyakishev N.P. Relationship between interaction parameters and atomic characteristics of components. Doklady AN SSSR. 1983, vol. 268, no. 5, pp. 1154–1156. (In Russ.).

19. Katsnelson A.M., Dashevskiy V.Ya., Kashin V.I. Carbon activity in Fe-, Co-, Niand Mn-based melts at 1873 K. Steel Research. 1993, vol. 64, pp. 197–202. http://doi.org/10.1002/srin.199301008

20. Sigworth G.K., Elliott J.F. The thermodynamics of liquid dilute iron alloys. Metal Science. 1974, vol. 8, no. 9, pp. 298–308. https://doi.org/10.1179/msc.1974.8.1.298

21. The Recommended Values for the Reaction in Steelmaking. 2nd ed., ed. by the 19 Committee (Ironmaking), Japan Soc. Promotion of Sci., Tokyo. 1984, 254 p.