Impact of transportation on foundry coke quality
https://doi.org/10.17073/0368-0797-2020-10-823-828
Abstract
The quality metrics of foundry coke are determined by testing at coke plants. Foundry coke consumers are foundry enterprises which are usually located far from the coke plants. Foundry coke is transported in bulk in open railway wagons. Therefore, this paper is aimed to determine the impact of transportation on the quality of foundry coke. The test conditions were as close as possible to real life conditions of foundry coke transportation. To estimate the impact of transportation distance we introduced the destruction index Pт (%). The results of experimental studies have shown that the destruction of foundry coke is not the same at different intervals of transportation. When transporting up to 300 km, the coke with the minimum durability index M40 is destroyed. When the distance is increased from 900 km up to 2500 km, the foundry coke destruction index (Pт , %) increases by 2.08 – 3.02 % depending on the batch. For all batches, a size fraction of less than 40 mm was noted depending on the durability index M40 from 0.25 to 1.41 %. The size fraction of more than 80 mm stays the same for foundry coke with higher durability indices. When the air humidity rises by 40 % during transportation, the amount of moisture in the coke samples of a 40 – 60 mm size fraction is more than 24 times higher than usual, a 60 – 80 mm size fraction – more than 17 times, an 80 mm and larger – more than 10 times. When the air humidity decreases by 34 %, the amount of moisture in a gram of coke of a 40 – 60 mm size fraction becomes 2 times lower than usual, a 60 – 80 mm size fraction – 1.26 times, an 80 mm and larger – 1.45 times. Compared to coke of size fractions 60 – 80 mm and 80 mm and larger, the moisture of the 40 – 60 mm size fraction coke grows faster when the air humidity increases as well.
Keywords
About the Authors
E. O. PobegalovaRussian Federation
Senior Lecturer
Yaroslavl
V. A. Ivanova
Russian Federation
Dr. Sci. (Eng.), Assist. Professor, Head of the Chair “Materials Technology, Standardization, and Metrology”
Yaroslavl
References
1. Lipnitskii A.M. Plavka chuguna i splavov tsvetnykh metallov [Melting of Cast Iron and Non-Ferrous Alloys]. Leningrad: Mashinostroenie, 1973, 192 p. (In Russ.).
2. Nefedov P.Ya., Strakhov V.M. Quality and efficiency of utilization of foundry coke in cupola. Koks i khimiya. 2003, no. 7, pp. 16–26. (In Russ.).
3. Matyukhin V.I., Matyukhina A.V., Babanin V.B., Zorin M.V., Stakheev S.G. Selecting the properties of metallurgical coke for cupola furnaces. Coke and Chemistry. 2015, vol. 58, no. 3, pp. 96–100.
4. Dolinskii V.A., Gainieva G.R., Nikitin L.D. Coal charge composition and properties impact on coke quality. Izvestiya. Ferrous Metallurgy. 2010, vol. 53, no. 2, pp. 14–16. (In Russ.).
5. North L., Blackmore K., Nesbitt K., Mahoney M.R. Methods of coke quality prediction: A review. Fuel. 2018, vol. 219, pp. 426–445.
6. Zhang Q., Wu X., Feng A., Shi M. Prediction of coke quality at Baosteel. Fuel Processing Technology. 2004, vol. 86, no. 1, pp. 1–11.
7. Kishore G.S., Jagannadham G., Alma S. Coal blend modeling and coke quality prediction studies - GIKIL’s success story. Proceedings of the Iron & Steel Technology Conference: 2 – 5 May 2011, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA. AIST, Association for Iron & Steel Technology. Ronald E. Ashburn, publ. 2011, vol. 1, pp. 207–216.
8. Tiwari H.P., Haldar S.K., Roy A., Bhattacharjee A., Mishra P. Data mining – new perspectives on predicting coke quality in recovery stamp charged coke making process. Metallurgical Research & Technology. 2015, vol. 112, no. 6, pp. 603–618.
9. Koszorek A., Krzesińska M., Pusz S., Pilawa B., Kwiecińska B. Relationship between the technical parameters of cokes produced from blends of three Polish coals of different coking ability. Int. Journal of Coal Geology. 2009, vol. 77, no. 3-4, pp. 363–371.
10. Lorez D., Sanada Y., Mondragon F. Effect to low-temperature oxidation of coal on hydrogen-transfer capability. Fuel. 1998, vol. 77, no. 14, pp. 1623–1628.
11. Sanchez J.E., Rincon J.M. Oxidation paths of a coking coal and comparison of its oxidized product with a non-coking coal. Fuel. 1997, vol. 76, no. 12, pp. 1137–1142.
12. Smędowski Ł., Piechaczek M. Impact of weathering on coal properties and evolution of coke quality described by optical and mechanical parameters. Int. Journal of Coal Geology. 2016, vol. 168, part 1, pp. 119–130.
13. Nyathi M.S., Kruse R., Mastalerz M., Bish D.L. Nature and origin of coke quality variation in heat-recovery coke making technology. Fuel. 2016, vol. 176, pp. 11–19.
14. Montiano M.G., Diaz-Faes E., Barriocanal C. Effect of briquette composition and size on the quality of the resulting coke. Fuel Processing Technology. 2016, vol. 148, pp. 155–162.
15. Montiano M.G., Diaz-Faes E., Barriocanal C., Alvarez R. Influence of biomass on metallurgical coke quality. Fuel. 2014, vol. 116, pp. 175–182.
16. GOST 3340-88. Koks liteinyi kamennougol’nyi. Tekhnicheskie usloviya [Foundry coal coke. Technical conditions]. Moscow: Izd-vo standartov, 1989, 4 p. (In Russ.).
17. Ivanova V.A., Yablonskii O.P. Preparation of accreditation documents of factory testing laboratories in the field of quality control of foundry coke. Zavodskaya laboratoriya. Diagnostika materialov. 2013, no. 6, pp. 66–70. (In Russ.).
18. GOST 22235-2010. Vagony gruzovye magistral’nykh zheleznykh dorog kolei 1520 mm. Obshchie trebovaniya po obespecheniyu sokhrannosti pri proizvodstve pogruzochno-razgruzochnykh i manevrennykh rabot [Freight wagons of the main railway expensive gauge 1520 mm. General requirements for ensuring safety during handling and maneuvering operations]. Moscow: Standartinform, 2011, 18 p. (In Russ.).
19. TU 0761-032-00187852-2015. Koks liteinyi kamennougol’nyi. Tekhnicheskie usloviya [Foundry coal coke. Technical conditions]. 2015, 13 p. (In Russ.).
20. MI 2083-90 GSI. Izmereniya kosvennye. Opredelenie rezul’tatov izmerenii i otsenivanie ikh pogreshnostei [Indirect measurements. Determination of measurement results and evaluation of their errors]. Moscow: Izdatel’stvo standartov, 1991, 10 p. (In Russ.).
21. Ivanova V.A., Vdovin K.N. Test method for the determination of abrasion strength and abrasive ability of foundry coke. Izvestiya. Ferrous Metallurgy. 2016, vol. 59, no. 3, pp. 149–153. (In Russ.).
22. Ivanova V.A., Shamina E.O. Influence of environmental humidity on humidity of foundry coke. Khimiya tverdogo topliva. 2018, no. 6, pp. 46–50. (In Russ.).
Review
For citations:
Pobegalova E.O., Ivanova V.A. Impact of transportation on foundry coke quality. Izvestiya. Ferrous Metallurgy. 2020;63(10):823-828. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17073/0368-0797-2020-10-823-828