Preview

Izvestiya. Ferrous Metallurgy

Advanced search

Dioxins and furans in zinc-containing metallurgical dust: behavior and formation processes

https://doi.org/10.17073/0368-0797-2019-7-557-563

Abstract

The use of galvanized scrap as a charge material for electric steel-smelting production leads to the formation of metallurgical dust suitable for the extraction of non-ferrous metals. The issues related to the behavior of chlorine and its compounds in zinc and lead containing EAF-dust is not sufficiently studied. Current research exhibits the danger of chlorine and its compounds in charge and, consequently, in emissions of EAF. Chlorine and its compounds are considered to be the main components associated with the formation of highly toxic organic substances – dioxins and furans (D&F). D&F enter the environment not only in gaseous form, but also in the form of compounds adsorbed on the surface of dust particles. According to various data, D&F concentration is 5-500 ng / kg of dust and depends on the technological parameters of melting. Analysis of the formation processes of D&F in EAF and their behavior in the captured dust is given. It was found that at the studied chlorine content of 1.3% in EAF-dust from the charge materials, 99.9% of chlorine form relatively safe compounds, mainly chlorides, and a small amount goes to the formation of D&F. The amount of D&F adsorbed on the surface of captured dust particles was 474 ng / kg of dust. As strong toxicants, D&F increase the hazard category of dust from the 4th to the 3rd and above that must be considered at dust usage. In addition, the transport of D&F in the environment is due to solid particles that absorb poisons on their surface. Therefore, EAF dust, with D&F adsorbed on its surface, can provoke their entry into organisms. The ways of reducing D&F emission in the production of EAF-steel and the resource-saving and environmentally safe technologies of dust processing are considered. In particular, the possibility of using lime milk for the off-gases irrigation in the EAF gas flue was analyzed and it was shown that it allows to reduce the D&F content to acceptable limits. The efficiency of the proposed activities was evaluated.

About the Authors

L. M. Simonyan
National University of Science and Technology “MISIS” (MISIS)
Russian Federation
Dr. Sci. (Eng.), Professor of the Chair of Metallurgy of Steel, New Production Technologies and Metal Protection


N. V. Demidova
National University of Science and Technology “MISIS” (MISIS)
Russian Federation
MA Student


References

1. Osnovnye pokazateli okhrany okruzhayushchei sredy. 2017: Stat. sb. / Rosstat [Main indicators of environmental protection. 2017: Stat. coll. / Rosstat]. Moscow: 2017, 115 p. (In Russ.).

2. Promyshlennoe proizvodstvo v Rossii. 2016: Stat. sb. / Rosstat [Industrial production in Russia. 2016: Stat. coll. / Rosstat]. Moscow: 2016, 347 p. (In Russ.).

3. Pan’shin A.M., Leont’ev L.I., Kozlov P.A. etc. Processing technology of EAF-dust from JSC “Severstal’” in Welz-complex of JSC “Chelyabinsk zinc factory”. Ekologiya i promyshlennost’ Rossii. 2012, no. 11, pp. 4–6. (In Russ.).

4. Stovpchenko A.P., Kamkina L.V. Processes of EAF-dust recycling. Part. 2. Industrial processes of dust processing in medium power units. Elektrometallurgiya. 2010, no. 2, pp. 42–43. (In Russ.).

5. Zunkel D. What to do with your EAF dust. Steel Times International. 1996, no. 7, p. 46, 48–50.

6. Pickles C.A. Thermodynamic analysis of the selective chlorination of electric arc furnace dust. Journal of Hazardous Materials. 2009, vol. 166, no. 2-3, pp. 1030–1042.

7. Pedro Jorge Walburga Keglevich de Buzina, Nestor Cezar Heckb, Antônio Cezar Faria Vilelac. EAF dust: An overview on the influences of physical, chemical and mineral features in its recycling and waste incorporation routes. Journal of Materials Research and Technology. 2016, no. 4, pp. 194–202.

8. Lohmann R., Lee R.G.M., Green N.J.L., Jones K.C. Gas-particle partitioning of PCDD/Fs in daily air samples. Atmospheric Environ. 2000, vol. 34, no. 16, pp. 2529–2537.

9. Mukherjee A., Debnath B., Sadhan Kumar Ghosh. A review on technologies of removal of dioxins and furans from incinerator flue gas. Procedia Environmental Sciences. 2016, no. 35, pp. 528–540.

10. Freeman R.A., Hileman F.D., Noble R.W., Schroy J.M. Experiments on the mobility of 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin at Times Beach, Missouri. In: Solving Hazardous Waste Problems. Exner J.H. ed. Washington: ACS Symposium Series no. 338, 1987, Chapter 9.

11. Puri R.K., Clevenger R.K., Kapila S., Yanders A.F., Malhotra A.F. Studies of parameters affecting translocation of tetrachlorodibenzop-dioxin in soil. Chemosphere. 1989, vol.18, no. 1-6, pp. 1291–1296.

12. Puri R.K., Kapila S., Lo Y.H., Orazio C., Clevenger T.E., Yanders A.F. Effect of co-contaminants on the disposition of polychlorinated dibenzofurans in saturated soils. Chemosphere. 1990, vol. 20, no. 10-12, pp. 1589–1596.

13. Rezaei E., Farahani A., Buekens A., Chen T., Lu S.Y., Habibinejad M., Damercheli F., Andalib Moghadam S.H., Gandomkar M., Bahmani A. Dioxins and furans releases in Iranian mineral industries. Chemosphere. 2013, vol. 91, no. 6, pp. 838–843.

14. Petrosyan V.S. Dioxyns: scarecrow or real threat? Teoreticheskaya i prikladnaya ekologiya. 2009, no. 1, pp. 41–47. (In Russ.).

15. Eskenazi B., Warner M., Brambilla P., Signorini S., Ames J., Mocarelli P. The Seveso accident: A look at 40 years of health research and beyond. Environment International. 2018, no. 121, pp. 71–84.

16. Antunes P., Viana P., VinhasT. , Rivera J., Gaspar E.M.S.M. Emission profiles of polychlorinated dibenzodioxins, polychlorinated dibenzofurans (PCDD/Fs), dioxin-like PCBs and hexachlorobenzene (HCB) from secondary metallurgy industries in Portugal. Chemosphere. 2012, vol. 88, no. 11, pp. 1332–1339.

17. Vehlow J. Thermische Behandlungsverfahren fuer Hausmuellim Vergleich. Graz: Forschungszentrum Karlsruhe GmbH, Institut fuer Technische Chemie, Bereich Thermische Abfallbehandlung, 1998, 37 p. (In Germ.).

18. Aksel’rod L.M., Fedosov I.B., Baranov A.P. etc. Processing of zinc-containing EAF-dusts at “Ural-recycling” (JSC “Magnesite Plant”). In: Sb. dokl. 4 Mezhdunarodnoi konf. “Metallurgiya – INTEKhEKO – 2011” [Proceedings 4th Int. Conf. “Metallurgiya – INTEKHEHKO – 2011” on March 29 – 30, 2011, Moscow]. Mos-cow: 2011, pp. 136–139. (In Russ.).

19. Lisin V.S., Yusfin Yu.S. Resurso-ekologicheskie problemy XXI veka i metallurgiya [Resource and environmental problems of the XXI century and metallurgy]. Moscow: Vyssh. shk., 1998, 447 p. (In Russ.).

20. US EPA. Exposure and Human Health Reassessment of 2,3,7,8-Tetrachlorodibenzo-p-Dioxin (TCDD) and Related Compounds. Path 1, vol. 2. Washington, DC, EPA/600/P-00/001Ab, 2000, 628p.

21. Khofshtadler K., Gebert V., Lantsershtorfer K. etc. “Air fine” system for dioxin removal from sinter production and electric arc furnaces off-gases. Stal’. 2001, no. 12, pp. 81–84. (In Russ.).

22. Elanskii G.N., Medvedev M.N. Environmental danger. Stal’. 2000, no. 2, pp. 82–86. (In Russ.).

23. Ivanov A.I., Lyandres M.B., Prokof’ev O.V. Proizvodstvo magniya [Magnesium production]. Moscow: Metallurgiya, 1979, 376 p. (In Russ.).


Review

For citations:


Simonyan L.M., Demidova N.V. Dioxins and furans in zinc-containing metallurgical dust: behavior and formation processes. Izvestiya. Ferrous Metallurgy. 2019;62(7):557-563. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17073/0368-0797-2019-7-557-563

Views: 810


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 0368-0797 (Print)
ISSN 2410-2091 (Online)