VOLUMETRIC CHANGES AT HEATING IN STEEL 60Si2CrV SUBJECTED TO Q&P TREATMENT
https://doi.org/10.17073/0368-0797-2019-1-42-48
Abstract
The paper presents results of the investigation of phasestructural transformations and volumetric changes that occur during heating in high-silicon spring steel 60Si2CrV subjected to Q&P(quenching and partition) treatment. Chemical composition of the steel was: 0.53 % C; 1.46 % Si; 0.44 % Mn; 0.95 % Cr; 0.10 % V; 0.016 % S; 0.013 % P. Steel samples were subjected to Q-n-P treatment as follows: a) austenitization at 880 °C; b) quenching with the cooling stop at 120, 160, 200 and 240 °C; c) subsequent holding at 220, 250 and 300 °С with duration from 10 to 3600 s; d) final cooling in water. The volumetric changes during heating were studied using an optical differential dilatometer at a heating rate of 1 K/s. As a reference, a sample of the same steel stabilized by high tempering was used. The amount of retained austenite was determined by X-ray diffraction using a diffractometer DRON-3 with Fe-radiation. It is found that on the heating curves of Q&P samples, the sections corresponding to different transformations during tempering are clearly identified. On dilatograms of the Q&P samples, dilatometric effect corresponding to the second transformation during tempering (270 – 430 °C) was found to be increased dramatically, indicating an increase in retained austenite amount compared to the quenched state as a result of Q&P treatment (as confirmed by Xray study). At the same time, value of the effect corresponding to the third transformation during tempering was found to be decreased. To obtain the maximum amount of retained austenite in 60Si2CrV steel, the partitioning temperature should be of 260 – 300 °С, while the quenching completion temperature should be of 160 – 240 °С. The amount of retained austenite rises substantially as the quenching temperature increases. Duration of the partitioning stage should be selected taking into account the extreme character of austenite dependence on the partitioning time. As a result of the work, an effective applicability of the dilatometric method for analyzing the steel structural state and choosing the optimal mode of Q&P treatment was demonstrated.
About the Authors
V. I. ZurnadzhiRussian Federation
Postgraduate of the Chair of Material Science and Advanced Technologies
V. G. Efremenko
Russian Federation
Dr. Sci. (Eng.), Professor, Head of the Chair of Physics
M. N. Brykov
Russian Federation
Dr. Sci. (Eng.), Professor of the Chair of Welding Technology and Equipment
V. G. Gavrilova
Russian Federation
Cand. Sci. (Eng.), Assist. Professor, Head of the Chair of Material Science and Advanced Technologies
E. V. Tsvetkova
Russian Federation
Cand. Sci. (Phys.–Math.), Assist. Professor of the Chair of Physics
References
1. Speer J.G., Matlock D.K., De Cooman B.C. etc. Carbon partitioning into austenite after martensite transformation. Acta Materialia. 2003, vol. 51, pp. 2611–2622.
2. Speer J.G., Edmonds D.V., Rizzo F.C. etc. Partitioning of carbon from supersaturated plates of ferrite, with application to steel processing and fundamentals of the bainite transformation. Solid State and Materials Science. 2004, vol. 8, pp. 219237.
3. Edmonds D.V., He K., Rizzo F.C. etc. Quenching and partitioning martensite – A novel steel heat treatment. Materials Science and Engineering A. 2006, vol. 438, pp. 25–34.
4. Santofimia M.J., Zhao L., Sietsma J. Overview of mechanisms involved during the quenching and partitioning process in steels. Metallurgical and Materials Transactions: A. 2011, vol. 42A, pp. 3620–3626.
5. Zhong N., Wang X.D., Wang L. etc. Enhancement of the mechanical properties of a Nb-microalloyed advanced high-strength steel treated by quenching–partitioning–tempering process. Materials Science and Engineering A. 2009, vol. 506, pp. 111–116.
6. Yurchenko A.N., Simonov Yu.N. Microstructural features, mechanical properties and heat treatment of bainitic steel. Vestnik Permskogo natsional’nogo issledovatel’skogo politekhnicheskogo universiteta. Mashinostroenie, materialovedenie. 2016, vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 160181. (In Russ.).
7. Jing S., Hao Y. Microstructure development and mechanical properties of quenching and partitioning (Q&P) steel and an incorporation of hot-dipping galvanization during Q&P process. Materials Science & Engineering A. 2013, vol. 586, pp. 100–107.
8. Hesse O., Merker J., Brykov M. etc. Zur Festigkeit niedriglegierter Stäble mit erhöhtem Kohlenstoffgehalt gegen abrasiven Verschleiß. Tribologie und Schmierungstechnik. 2013. vol. 60 (6), pp. 37–43. (In Germ.)
9. Koval’ A.D., Efremenko V.G., Brykov M.N. etc. Principles of development of grinding media with increased wear resistance. Part 1. Abrasive wear resistance of iron-based alloys. Journal of Friction Wear. 2012, vol. 33 (1), pp. 39–46.
10. Efremenko V.G., Shimizu K., Cheiliakh A.P. etc. Abrasive resistance of metastable V–Cr–Mn–Ni spheroidal carbide cast irons using the factorial design method. International Journal of Minerals, Metallurgy, and Materials. 2016, vol. 23 (6), pp. 645–657.
11. Toji Y., Miyamoto G., Raabe D. Carbon partitioning during quenching and partitioning heat treatment accompanied by carbide precipitation. Acta Materialia. 2015, vol. 86, pp. 137–147.
12. Clarke A.J. Speer J.G., Miller M.K. etc. Carbon partitioning to austenite from martensite or bainite during the quenching and partition (Q&P) process: A critical assessment. Acta materialia. 2008, vol. 56, pp. 16-22.
13. Kurdiumov G.V., Utevskii L.M., Entin R.I.M. Prevrashcheniya v zheleze i stali [Transformations in iron and steel]. Moscow: Nauka, 1977, 236 p. (In Russ.).
14. Maheswari N., Chowdhury S., Kumar K.C. etc. Influence of alloying elements on the microstructure evolution and mechanical properties in quenched and partitioned steels. Materials science & engineering A. 2014, vol. 600, pp. 12–20.
15. Liu S.G., Dong S.S., Yang F. Application of quenching–partitioning–tempering process and modification to a newly designed ultrahigh steel. Materials and design. 2014, no. 56, pp. 37–43.
16. Huang X., Liu W., Huang Y. etc. Effect of a quenching–long partitioning treatment on the microstructure and mechanical properties of a 0.2 C % bainitic steel. Journal of materials processing technology. 2015, vol. 222, pp. 181–187.
17. Toji Y. Matsuda H., Herbig M. etc. Atomic-scale analysis of carbon partitioning between martensite and austenite by atom probe tomography and correlative transmission electron microscopy. Acta materialia. 2014, vol. 65, pp. 215228.
18. Speer J. G., De Moor E., Findley K.O. etc. Analysis of microstructure evolution in quenching and partitioning automotive sheet steel. Metallurgical and materials transactions: A. 2011, vol. 42A, pp. 3591–3601.
19. Zhao P., Zhang B., Cheng C. etc. The significance of ultrafine filmlike retained austenite in governing very high cycle fatigue behavior in an ultrahigh-strength Mn–Si–Cr–C steel. Materials science and engineering: A. 2015, vol. 645, pp. 116121.
20. Santigopal S., Sourav D., Debalay Ch. etc. Development of multiphase microstructure with bainite, martensite and retained austenite in a co-containing steel through quenching and partitioning (Q&P) treatment. Metallurgical and materials transactions: А. 2013, vol. 13, pp. 5653–5664.
21. Gulyaev A.P. Metallovedenie: uchebnik dlya vuzov [Metal science. Textbook for universities]. Moscow: Metallurgiya, 1986, 544 p. (In Russ.).
22. Shmykov A.A. Spravochnik termista [Handbook of heat-treater]. Moscow: Mashgiz, 1961, 392 p. (In Russ.).
Review
For citations:
Zurnadzhi V.I., Efremenko V.G., Brykov M.N., Gavrilova V.G., Tsvetkova E.V. VOLUMETRIC CHANGES AT HEATING IN STEEL 60Si2CrV SUBJECTED TO Q&P TREATMENT. Izvestiya. Ferrous Metallurgy. 2019;62(1):42-48. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17073/0368-0797-2019-1-42-48